Road Cycling · Public discussion

ANN: Bicycle wiki online .

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 3 posts · 491 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
27 March 2006
Last activity
27 March 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
491
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello everyone,

    I just wanted to announce that I have launched a new wiki for
    bicycle/cycling related content at http://www.velowiki.com/ .

    If you feel you have something to contribute, please feel free to do
    so. The site is very new and any contributions will help.

    If you have any questions, comments or suggestions about the site,
    please feel free to contact me off list.

    Thanks,
    Carl.

  2. Quoted message said:

    Hello everyone,

    Quoted message said:

    I just wanted to announce that I have launched a new wiki for
    bicycle/cycling related content at http://www.velowiki.com/ .

    Quoted message said:

    If you feel you have something to contribute, please feel free to do
    so. The site is very new and any contributions will help.

    Quoted message said:

    If you have any questions, comments or suggestions about the site,
    please feel free to contact me off list.

    I think you need to referee the input. Wikipedia has a few bicycle
    related items that are full of myth and lore already and no one to
    review the stuff.

    Jobst Brandt

  3. Quoted message said:

    I think you need to referee the input. Wikipedia has a few bicycle
    related items that are full of myth and lore already and no one to
    review the stuff.

    Although I agree about the pervasiveness of myth and lore, I tend to
    think that the referees are often (sometimes indirectly) responsible;
    as in myths being published and propagated by 'authoritative'
    magazines, and sometimes even created in less than honest marketing
    campaigns.

    The potential strong point of an open peer review is that no matter how
    popular a "common truth" may be, it provides an opportunity to voice an
    alternative, which if backed my logic and facts, will be hard to deny.

    Additonally, one advantage I hope that biciwiki.com will have over
    other wikis is that it is specific to bicycle related topics. I can't
    help but get the feeling that 93.27%(1) of wikipedians don't care too
    much about, or know enough about to review, the bicycle related topics,
    and hopefully this will be different.

    Cheers,
    Carl.

    (1) Based on internet studies that show that 82.7823% of all internet
    statistics are completely made up.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.