Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

aggressive roadbike?

Started by mutsu · · Last activity · 3 posts · 1,016 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
21 May 2005
Last activity
21 May 2005
Original author
mutsu
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,016
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi,

    I was wondering what do you look for in a road bike for aggressive position and geometry. This is for good aerodynamic and pure speed? Like what numbers or frame styles?

    I know the more expensive the bike the better components etc and the lighter the bike which mean going faster but I would like toa get a cost effective bike. Bang for the buck in speed.

    I don't race or commute but I just like to ride and ride fast..hehehe
    I'm looking for a road bike since my 'dale f700 with slick is not getting the speed I want on the paved road(running out of gear too).

    thanks
    Mutsu

  2. mutsu said:

    Hi,

    I was wondering what do you look for in a road bike for aggressive position and geometry. This is for good aerodynamic and pure speed? Like what numbers or frame styles?

    I know the more expensive the bike the better components etc and the lighter the bike which mean going faster but I would like toa get a cost effective bike. Bang for the buck in speed.

    I don't race or commute but I just like to ride and ride fast..hehehe
    I'm looking for a road bike since my 'dale f700 with slick is not getting the speed I want on the paved road(running out of gear too).

    thanks
    Mutsu


    I'd go to a good LBS that can fit you to a bike and do some test rides. An extreme aero position may not be what you can or should handle. Being comfortable in a good aero tuck position in the drops will help your speed. But if you're not comfortable on the bike, it doesn't matter how low-drag you are since you won't want to ride it.

    Forget the notion that a lighter bike is going to be faster; that's just not significant for us recreational riders. Most any low-to-mid range bike these days is going to be fine weight-wise; don't worry about spending extra money to save a pound or two on the bike.

  3. dhk said:

    Forget the notion that a lighter bike is going to be faster; that's just not significant for us recreational riders. Most any low-to-mid range bike these days is going to be fine weight-wise; don't worry about spending extra money to save a pound or two on the bike.

    Wow!
    You so rarely hear such blasphemous TRUTH on this board! 🙄

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.