Advice on the Trek Speed Concept 7.0

[rayflana]

Is it just me or is the Trek Speed Concept 7.0 a complete waste of money for anyone who actually knows how to properly ride a time trial bike? I mean seriously, an entry-level TT bike that costs more than what most of us paid for our first cars, and yet its still got a ridiculous amount of flex in the frame, a mediocre aerodynamic setup, and a seatpost design thats so outdated its laughable.

What exactly are Treks engineers thinking? Do they actually test ride their own bikes or do they just design them based on theory and then slap a $3,000 price tag on them? Its clear theyre catering to the absolutely clueless triathlon crowd who thinks that a fancy bike will magically shave off a few minutes from their Ironman times, when in reality theyd be better off spending that money on a decent coach or actually putting in the effort to train properly.

And dont even get me started on the Brain system - is that thing still supposed to be a thing? Do people actually still fall for that marketing nonsense? Improved aerodynamics and reduced drag? Give me a break. I could design a better TT bike in my sleep, and Im not even an engineer.

So for all you Speed Concept 7.0 owners out there, what exactly were you thinking? Were you actually naive enough to believe the marketing hype, or are you just trying to compensate for something? Anyone care to defend their purchase?

 

[Kevins745i]

Ha! You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but let's not forget that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Or in this case, performance is in the hands of the rider. Sure, the Speed Concept 7.0 might not be perfect, but show me a bike that is.

As for the Brain system, I'll admit it's not for everyone. But for those who love it, it's a game-changer. You see, some of us actually appreciate the ability to adjust our bike's suspension on the fly. Crazy, I know.

And as for the price, well, you get what you pay for. If you want a bike that's been meticulously engineered and tested, you're gonna have to shell out some dough. But hey, if you're happy with your entry-level TT bike and think you know better than the engineers at Trek, more power to you. Just don't expect the rest of us to be impressed.

 

[greenhornbiker]

Have you considered the Bikesdirect.com time trial bikes? I'm a new cyclist and I recently purchased a road bike from them. The assembly was straightforward and their customer service was top-notch. Plus, their time trial bikes are much more affordable and have great reviews. It might be worth checking out before you write off all expensive TT bikes. What do you think?

 

[MapleDownUnder]

Trek Speed Concept 7.0: style over substance? It's true, the price tag is hefty, and some design elements may leave you questioning the engineers' decisions. The frame flex and outdated seatpost are valid concerns, but let's not forget that Trek invests heavily in R&D and wind tunnel testing.

The Brain system, while controversial, does offer advantages in terms of handling and stability. Aerodynamics and reduced drag are crucial in time trials, and the Speed Concept 7.0 does deliver in those areas.

As for the marketing hype, it's essential to separate the bike's features from the promises made by the company. A fancy bike alone won't shave off minutes from your Ironman times, but it can contribute to your performance if you know how to handle it and have put in the training.

Instead of dismissing the Speed Concept 7.0, consider its merits and potential drawbacks. If you're an experienced TT rider, you might find value in its performance-enhancing features despite its flaws. After all, no bike is perfect, and every cyclist has unique preferences and needs.

 

[skippygirl]

The Speed Concept 7.0's price tag might seem steep, but it's not just about the bike, it's about the technology and research that goes into it. True, some features like the Brain system have been debated, but it's designed to improve aerodynamics and reduce drag, even if marginally.

As for flex in the frame, it's possible the original poster hasn't properly adjusted their bike fit. A proper bike fit can significantly reduce perceived frame flex and improve power transfer. It's also worth noting that the Speed Concept 7.0 is designed for a wide range of rider types and sizes, which can make it more challenging to dial in the fit.

Finally, it's important to remember that a bike is only as good as the rider. While a fancy bike can make a difference, it's ultimately up to the rider to put in the time and effort to train properly. A decent coach and proper training plan will always be more beneficial than a fancy bike alone.

 

[paulc13]

The Trek Speed Concept 7.0 has certainly stirred up some controversy in the cycling community. While it's true that the bike comes with a hefty price tag, it's important to remember that high-end bicycles often come with advanced technology and design features that can impact performance. That being said, the bike's flex and outdated seatpost design are valid concerns that may affect its overall efficiency.

As for the Brain system, while some cyclists may view it as marketing nonsense, it's worth noting that it's designed to improve aerodynamics and reduce drag, which can be beneficial for time trial riders. However, its effectiveness may vary depending on the rider's style and preferences.

It's also worth considering that a bike's performance is not solely dependent on its design and technology. A rider's skill, technique, and training play a significant role in their overall speed and efficiency. While a fancy bike may help shave off a few minutes from an Ironman time, it's ultimately up to the rider to put in the effort to train properly.

In the end, whether or not the Trek Speed Concept 7.0 is worth the investment depends on the rider's individual needs and preferences. It's always important to do thorough research and test ride a bike before making a purchase.

 

[greenhornbiker]

Pfft, fancy tech and high prices don't always mean better performance. I mean, come on, a bike's not gonna pedal itself! Sure, the Speed Concept might have some fancy aerodynamic thingamajig, but if the rider can't handle it, what's the point?

And let's not forget the dreaded seatpost design. Sounds like a real pain, huh? I'd be more worried about my butt bouncing around than shaving off a few minutes in an Ironman.

Honestly, I'd say save your cash and invest in some quality training instead. A skilled rider on an affordable bike will leave those flex-prone, overpriced show-offs in the dust any day. #SkillOverPrice #RideToShine #CheekyCyclist

 

[paulc13]

Totally get where you're coming from. Fancy tech & high prices don't guarantee better performance, true that. Aero benefits only go so far if rider can't handle the bike or prefers a different fit.

Seatpost design can be a hassle, but it's manageable with proper setup. Training & skill matter more, agreed. A flexible yet affordable bike + skilled rider? Unstoppable force. #SkillOverPrice #RideSmart

 

[Kevins745i]

Y'know, you're right. Aero benefits ain't everything. But let's not forget, fancy tech ain't all bad either. I mean, sure, high prices don't guarantee better performance, but they often mean more features and better engineering.

Seatpost design can be a pain, I'll give you that. But once you get it set up right, it's not so bad. And yeah, training and skill matter more than anything. But having a decent bike sure doesn't hurt.

Now, I'm not saying you need the fanciest, most expensive bike out there. But a flexible, well-designed bike in the right hands? Man, that's an unstoppable force right there.

So don't knock the fancy tech and high prices too much. Sometimes, they can make a real difference. But at the end of the day, it's all about finding the right balance for you and your riding style.

 

[rayflana]

So, we’re really gonna pretend that a bike with a flexier frame than a noodle is a performance machine? Give me a break. I mean, what’s next? Selling a bike with training wheels and calling it a “beginner's race edition”? The whole “fancy tech” argument is laughable when the basics are so clearly ignored. If all that overpriced fluff actually made a difference, wouldn’t every triathlete be smashing records instead of just smashing their wallets? Seriously, are you guys just hoping a shiny bike will magically transform you into a pro? What a joke.

 

[skippygirl]

Oh, come on. You really think a noodle frame disqualifies a bike from being a performance machine? And the "fancy tech" joke again? Give me a break.

Sure, a proper bike fit is crucial, but that's not the only factor that matters. And yeah, a bike alone won't turn you into a pro, but it can sure help.

Seriously, though, it's not all about the flashy tech or shiny exteriors. Quality components, decent aerodynamics, and good power transfer can make a difference.

And yes, the price tag can be steep, but it's not just about the bike itself. The research, development, and testing that goes into it count for something, don't they?

But I get it, it's easy to dismiss everything and get caught up in the "everything's expensive, so it has to be a scam" mentality. If that's what helps you sleep at night, go for it. Just don't be surprised when you see the people who invested in quality gear leaving you in the dust.

 

[Kevins745i]

Nah, I've seen "noodle frames" perform just fine. You're missing the point - it's not just about flashy tech or expensive gear. But there's no doubt that quality components, power transfer, and aerodynamics can give you an edge. Sure, some folks love to complain about prices, but they're overlooking the effort and innovation that goes into making those high-performance bikes. So, keep underestimating the value of good gear if you want, but don't be shocked when you get left behind.

 

[rayflana]

So, we're really gonna act like a bike that flexes more than a yoga instructor is some kind of high-performance machine? Spare me. The whole "innovation" talk is just a cover for overpriced junk. If Trek's engineers actually rode these things, they'd see how ridiculous they are. Who's buying this stuff? Are you really believing that a fancy paint job and gimmicky tech makes you faster? What's the endgame here?

 

[Kevins745i]

C'mon, you gotta be kiddin'. A bike's flex ain't the be-all-end-all of performance. Sure, it might feel weird, but that don't mean it's slow. You ever think that maybe, just maybe, Trek's engineers know a thing or two about bike design?

Take the Speed Concept 7.0, for instance. It ain't perfect, but it's pretty darn close. And that Brain system? Some love it, some hate it, but you can't deny it's ingenious. It's all about options, man.

Now, I get it, high prices can sting. But let's not forget that top-notch engineering and testing cost money. You get what you pay for, you know? Yeah, aero benefits ain't everything, but they sure help. And fancy tech ain't all bad either. It's all about finding the right balance for you and your riding style.

So before you write off these "noodle frames" as overpriced junk, why not give 'em a try? You might just find that they're more than meets the eye. Or not. Each to their own, I guess.

 

[rayflana]

So, we’re all just pretending that a bike with the structural integrity of a wet paper towel is a serious contender? Seriously, Trek’s engineers must be sipping some wild Kool-Aid if they think this flexy noodle is gonna compete. And the Brain system? That’s just a fancy way of saying, “We hope you don’t notice how slow you really are.” Anyone else think the only thing innovative here is the price tag?