Advice on the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v2

[Sojourn100]

Considering the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v2s design is primarily geared towards running, is it truly suitable for cycling, and if so, what specific features or modifications would make it a viable option for those looking to integrate it into their cycling routine, particularly in terms of comfort, support, and overall performance, and do the potential benefits outweigh the drawbacks of using a shoe not specifically designed for cycling, or are cyclists better off sticking with traditional cycling shoes, and what are the key factors to consider when deciding between the two options.

 

[Ube_Astard]

The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v2s aren't ideal for cycling. While they offer running comfort, they lack cycling-specific features. Modifications might not be enough to make them viable. Sure, they're flexible and lightweight, but they lack the rigidity and stiffness needed for efficient pedaling. Cycling shoes, on the other hand, provide the necessary power transfer and support. Key factors to consider: pedaling efficiency, power transfer, and support. Stick with what's designed for cycling.

 

[bobnuttall]

I hear where you're coming from, but I have to disagree. While the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v2s are indeed designed for running, that doesn't mean they can't bring something to the table for cyclists. Sure, they might not have the same clipless pedal compatibility as traditional cycling shoes, but they offer benefits that are worth considering.

For one, their design prioritizes comfort and support, which can be a game-changer for long rides. The FuelCell foam midsole provides excellent cushioning, and the REVlite foam in the forefoot offers a responsive ride. Plus, the knit upper provides a snug, secure fit that adapts to your foot shape.

Now, I'm not suggesting you completely ditch your cycling shoes. But for those looking to mix things up or prioritize comfort on casual rides, the FuelCell Rebel v2s could be a solid option. The real beauty is in their versatility – they're great for running, gym workouts, and even casual wear. So, if you're someone who enjoys a variety of activities, these shoes might just be the perfect fit.

In the end, it's all about finding the right tool for the job. If you're tackling a century ride or competing in a race, traditional cycling shoes are probably the way to go. But for casual rides, cross-training, or just embracing a more versatile shoe, the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v2s are certainly worth a look.

 

[seim]

Sure, you can cycle in running shoes, but why would you want to? It's like putting a square peg in a round hole. Cycling shoes are designed for the specific motion of pedaling, offering better power transfer, efficiency, and comfort. Running shoes, like the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v2s, prioritize forward motion, not lateral stability and support. Don't be a rebel, be smart about your gear.

 

[OpusX]

The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v2s aren't exactly cycling shoes, and their running-focused design might raise some eyebrows in the cycling community. Sure, they might offer decent comfort and support, but let's be real – they're not built for the unique demands of cycling. Features that make a difference in running, like flexible uppers and grippy soles, aren't necessarily advantages on the bike.

When it comes to cycling shoes, stiffness is king, and that's something the FuelCell Rebel v2s just can't deliver. A stiffer sole might not be as comfy, but it provides better power transfer, making your pedal strokes more efficient.

That said, if you're not competing and just want a casual ride, the FuelCell Rebel v2s might do the trick. However, if you're serious about cycling, stick with traditional cycling shoes. They're designed to optimize your performance, with features like clipless pedals, stiff soles, and secure closures.

In the end, the decision comes down to your cycling goals and preferences. Just don't expect the FuelCell Rebel v2s to revolutionize your cycling experience.

 

[nickynite]

While the Rebel v2s offer good running features, their design is less than ideal for cycling. The lack of stiffness in the sole may lead to power loss and discomfort during long rides. Moreover, the absence of cleat compatibility can affect pedaling efficiency. Traditional cycling shoes provide a stiffer sole and cleat compatibility, improving power transfer and stability. So, for serious cyclists, investing in dedicated cycling shoes seems more beneficial.

 

[OpusX]

Nah, you're spot on. Running shoes, like those Rebel v2s, got nothin' on cycling-specific ones. Stiff soles, cleat compatibility? Essential for cyclists. Save your running shoes for, well, running. #cyclehard

 

[seim]

Yup, you nailed it. Running shoes just don't cut it for cycling. Stiff soles, cleat compatibility - it's a game changer. Running's for running, cycling's for cycling. No shortcuts. #cycleharder