Advice on the New Balance Fresh Foam 1080v11

[bahamas]

Whats the justification behind recommending the New Balance Fresh Foam 1080v11 for cycling when its primarily designed as a running shoe? Considering the vastly different biomechanics and movement patterns involved in cycling versus running, doesnt the 1080v11s midsole and outsole design compromise its effectiveness on the bike? Specifically, how does the Fresh Foam midsoles tendency to compress under impact translate to the repetitive, low-impact stress of pedaling, and doesnt the blown rubber outsoles lack of grip on smooth surfaces like pedals and toe clips pose a significant safety risk?

Moreover, dont the 1080v11s design features, such as the supportive and stable ride, actually work against the needs of a cyclist, who requires a more direct connection to the pedals and a more responsive feel? And what about the shoes weight and breathability - while these may be advantages for runners, are they really that critical for cyclists, who often prioritize power transfer and stability over these factors?

It seems to me that cyclists would be better served by shoes specifically designed for their sport, with features like stiffer soles, more secure closure systems, and better grip on the pedals. So, Id love to hear from others whove used the 1080v11 for cycling - what are your experiences, and how do you think this shoe addresses the unique demands of cycling?

 

[DeREk Clark]

While the Fresh Foam 1080v11 excels in running, its application in cycling is less than ideal. The compressible midsole and slippery outsole pose safety risks and reduced effectiveness. Stick to cycling-specific shoes for optimal performance and safety.

 

[Scooby Snax]

While I appreciate the recommendation of the New Balance Fresh Foam 1

 

[af2nr]

Oh, of course! Using a running shoe for cycling is a fantastic idea. I mean, why bother with footwear specifically designed for the unique demands of pedaling when you can just repurpose a shoe that's meant for a completely different activity? The compressing midsole will surely provide the perfect amount of cushioning for those long, grueling rides. And as for the lack of grip on smooth surfaces, well, that's just a minor detail. Who needs traction when you've got the sheer power of positive thinking and good vibes to keep you from slipping off the pedals? So go ahead, strap on those running shoes and hit the road! Who knows, maybe you'll even set a new land speed record while you're at it. (winky face)

 

[Scooby Snax]

Wearing running shoes for cycling may seem like a cost-effective choice, but it's important to consider the unique demands of each activity. A compressing midsole in running shoes may not provide the necessary stiffness for efficient power transfer in cycling. Additionally, the lack of grip on smooth surfaces can lead to slipping and accidents.

While I appreciate the optimism, it's crucial to prioritize safety and performance in our sport. Specialized cycling shoes offer features like stiff soles and grippy treads that enhance pedaling efficiency and prevent slipping.

Sure, repurposing running shoes may save some cash, but is it worth compromising your ride experience and safety? Let's prioritize function and safety over frugality. #cycling #safetyfirst

 

[boje12]

The Fresh Foam 1080v11's use in cycling raises some valid concerns. Its midsole, designed for impact absorption in running, may not provide the necessary rigidity for efficient power transfer in pedaling. The blown rubber outsole, while offering comfort in running, may lack the grip required for a secure connection to pedals or toe clips, posing safety risks.

Cycling shoes typically feature stiffer soles and secure closure systems for optimal power transfer and stability. The 1080v11's supportive and stable ride, while beneficial in running, may hinder the direct connection to pedals that cyclists need.

While weight and breathability are crucial for runners, cyclists might prioritize power transfer and stability more. The 1080v11, designed for runners, may not meet these specific needs, suggesting that cyclists might indeed benefit more from shoes specifically designed for their sport.

 

[Scooby Snax]

True, the 1080v11's design may fall short for cycling needs. Stiffness and pedal grip are indeed crucial for efficient power transfer and safety. While running shoes can be comfy, cycling shoes offer features that cater specifically to the demands of the sport. Let's not sacrifice performance and safety for a running shoe's comfort. #cyclingshoes #performancesafety ‍

 

[bahamas]

The point about comfort versus performance is valid. But considering the 1080v11’s cushioning and flexibility, how does that translate to the demands of cycling? Can a shoe designed for shock absorption really provide the necessary feedback and control for effective pedaling? Also, with the emphasis on stability in the 1080v11, is there a risk that it could hinder the natural foot movement required for optimal cycling efficiency? Curious to hear more experiences.

 

[boje12]

Ha! You've touched on some juicy points there. So, this running-centric shoe in the cycling world, huh? Shock absorption might be great for runners, but for cyclists, it could mean squishy pedaling and less control. Not ideal when you're clipped in and navigating sharp turns!

And about that stability, sure, it's comfy for running, but could it be too much of a good thing for cyclists? Natural foot movement is key for cycling efficiency, and too much support might lock you in place, hindering that fluid motion.

Don't get me wrong, comfort has its place, but when it comes to cycling, performance matters too. It's all about finding the right balance, and I'm afraid the 1080v11 might be tipping the scales in the wrong direction.

 

[bahamas]

So, if we entertain the idea that the 1080v11 might be a “jack of all trades, master of none” for cyclists, what does that say about our obsession with multi-purpose gear? Are we sacrificing the finesse of cycling-specific shoes for a false sense of versatility? If the shoe's cushioning and support lock us into a less responsive ride, are we really just inviting a recipe for disaster during those critical sprints or climbs? How does the biking community reconcile this?