Road Cycling · Public discussion

advice on cheap camera for bicycle

Started by Sebastian Wren · · Last activity · 5 posts · 1,793 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
13 May 2003
Last activity
14 May 2003
Original author
Sebastian Wren
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,793
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello. I'm looking for some advice. I would like to carry a small, cheap digital camera on my bike.
    I need something that I can grab and use quickly and easily (but safely) -- preferably something I
    can mount on the handlebars. And of course, it needs to be small and light. Does anybody out there
    have any advice? Thanks.

  2. In article said:

    Hello. I'm looking for some advice. I would like to carry a small, cheap digital camera on my
    bike. I need something that I can grab and use quickly and easily (but safely) -- preferably
    something I can mount on the handlebars. And of course, it needs to be small and light. Does
    anybody out there have any advice? Thanks.

    At the bottom of the market is the Hawking Webcam. it's a 640x480 web camera that is detachable and
    becomes a very cheesy digital camera. it can hold 25 pix, and it costs $70.

    sample photo:

    sfu.catshirt.jpg

    note that this was indoors, and the camera is poor in low-lighht conditiions.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] sfu.ca~rcousine President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

  3. [email hidden] (Sebastian Wren) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello. I'm looking for some advice. I would like to carry a small, cheap digital camera on my
    bike. I need something that I can grab and use quickly and easily (but safely) -- preferably
    something I can mount on the handlebars. And of course, it needs to be small and light. Does
    anybody out there have any advice? Thanks.

    I got a used Kodak (520?) on Ebay for $25 US. New batteries ($12 CDN) were all it needed. I since
    bought a larger RAM card for $14 on sale, so the whole thing was about $65 CDN. It has a standard
    tripod mount, so I bought an appropriate bolt and connected it to my bars with a SS hose clamp -
    works great.

  4. Consider a film camera. With low priced cameras, it delivers much better results than digital. And
    with 1 hour photo places all over, it is pretty immediate as well. An Olympus Stylus is a great,
    small, water resistant film camera with a very good lens. At under $90 new, you also do not need to
    lose much sleep if you bounce it.

    Sebastian Wren said:

    Hello. I'm looking for some advice. I would like to carry a small, cheap digital camera on my
    bike. I need something that I can grab and use quickly and easily (but safely) -- preferably
    something I can mount on the handlebars. And of course, it needs to be small and light. Does
    anybody out there have any advice? Thanks.

  5. Tony Zipple <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Consider a film camera. With low priced cameras, it delivers much better results than digital. And
    with 1 hour photo places all over, it is pretty immediate as well. An Olympus Stylus is a great,
    small, water resistant film camera with a very good lens. At under $90 new, you also do not need
    to lose much sleep if you bounce it.

    I've got one, and I love it; it's presently my snapshot cam, good for carrying around in the pocket.

    Film junkie though I am (I've got a 100 foot bulk roll of TMY which I'll probably go through in the
    next few months) I wouldn't count digital out altogether. If all the OP is looking for is quick &
    dirty snapshots to post on the web, & maybe have the odd 4x6 print made, a very cheap digicam will
    probably do just fine. If you factor in film, paper, and chemical costs over a year, you probably
    come out the winner overall, cost-wise.

    If you're a cycletourist, though, film has its virtues; with a mechanical camera, you're free from
    the need to recharge or purchase batteries, which may be harder to find than film (especially if
    your camera uses fancy lithium thingies)....

    -Luigi who wishes 127 rollfilm was more available, so he could shoot with his granddady's jiffy
    kodak vest-pocket cam.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.