General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Advice?

Started by NiteDawg · · Last activity · 64 posts · 1,801 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
7 February 2006
Last activity
3 March 2006
Original author
NiteDawg
Posts
64
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,801
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 64
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Just as I started to believe, naively, that we're all alone in my
    unimaginably large, dark, cold, and lonely head,

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:
    DZ said:

    Just as I started to believe, naively, that the Intelligent Design is
    scraping the barrel,

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    Karma is the best enforcer of Darwinism.....

    Intelligent Design created Karma.

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    JRH said:
    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    DZ said:

    Just as I started to believe, naively, that the Intelligent Design is
    scraping the barrel, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:

    > Karma is the best enforcer of Darwinism.....

    Intelligent Design created Karma.

    That needs some qualifying, even if you believe in Karma or ID, which
    most of us don't!

    Personal belief systems are just that...
    Personal. ;-)

    That is one of our greatest freedoms.
    The ability to follow one's own spiritual beliefs.

    I rather like Karma. It's neat and efficient.
    You will get back whatever you do, whether it's good or evil.

    In this lifetime or the next.

    TBR will get his in the long run.
    I take comfort in that thought.

    Whether or not you believe that the creator/celestial engineer
    is male, female, monotheisitic or polytheistic does not really matter.
    So long as you believe in a higher power...

    Cheers!
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    DZ said:

    Just as I started to believe, naively, that we're all alone in my
    unimaginably large, dark, cold, and lonely head,

    Whatever works for you sir.......
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  4. OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    That is one of our greatest freedoms.
    The ability to follow one's own spiritual beliefs.

    Absolutely. I believe I'll have a beer.

    Stephen N.

  5. NiteDawg said:

    Came here looking for advice on exercise but found this board


    rife

    Quoted message said:

    with bickering small-minded idiots.........Maybe exercise can
    affect the brain in a negative way.......Advice?.......No


    thanks

    You're right. There are numerous (moderated) internet forums now
    that have replaced this ng. Find one you like and sign up.
    Usenet for exercise help is dead.

    locker

  6. In article <I38Gf.182671$km.90396@edtnps89>,

    Stephen said:
    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    That is one of our greatest freedoms.
    The ability to follow one's own spiritual beliefs.

    Absolutely. I believe I'll have a beer.

    Stephen N.

    Perfect!

    Kirin Ichiban anyone?

    <clink>

    Cheers!
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    locker said:
    NiteDawg said:

    Came here looking for advice on exercise but found this board


    rife

    Quoted message said:

    with bickering small-minded idiots.........Maybe exercise can
    affect the brain in a negative way.......Advice?.......No


    thanks

    You're right. There are numerous (moderated) internet forums now
    that have replaced this ng. Find one you like and sign up.
    Usenet for exercise help is dead.

    locker

    Proud of yourself?
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  8. OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    JRH said:
    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    DZ <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > Just as I started to believe, naively, that the Intelligent Design is
    > scraping the barrel, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
    >
    > > Karma is the best enforcer of Darwinism.....

    Intelligent Design created Karma.

    That needs some qualifying, even if you believe in Karma or ID, which
    most of us don't!

    Personal belief systems are just that...
    Personal. ;-)

    That is one of our greatest freedoms.
    The ability to follow one's own spiritual beliefs.

    I rather like Karma. It's neat and efficient.
    You will get back whatever you do, whether it's good or evil.

    In this lifetime or the next.

    TBR will get his in the long run.
    I take comfort in that thought.

    Whether or not you believe that the creator/celestial engineer
    is male, female, monotheisitic or polytheistic does not really matter.
    So long as you believe in a higher power...

    That's the point I made Om mate, most people don't, including me!

    However, I would really like to and it's not for the want of trying.
    At best I am a hopeful Agnostic...

  9. locker said:
    NiteDawg said:

    Came here looking for advice on exercise but found this board


    rife

    Quoted message said:

    with bickering small-minded idiots.........Maybe exercise can
    affect the brain in a negative way.......Advice?.......No


    thanks

    You're right. There are numerous (moderated) internet forums now
    that have replaced this ng. Find one you like and sign up.
    Usenet for exercise help is dead.

    It's true and John Williams was the architect of its downfall.

    Shame on you Williams - are you happy now? You more than most will
    mourn the passing of MFW, because it was fertile ground off which you
    fed and thrived, But you couldn't let it just continue and develop;
    no, you had to control it, and as a result of your overbearing
    bullying tactics, you killed the very thing you loved.

    The moderated forums are no good to you old man because you need to be
    in control, so you are doomed to play here with your silly "Filters"
    and dream of the good old days.

    Don't worry old chap, I'll stay here with you, just to make sure you
    don't do it all over again!! ;o)

  10. "JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    JRH said:

    On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:29:30 -0600, OmManiPadmeOmelet
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >In article <[email hidden]>,
    > DZ <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >> Just as I started to believe, naively, that the Intelligent Design is
    >> scraping the barrel, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
    >>
    >> > Karma is the best enforcer of Darwinism.....
    >
    >Intelligent Design created Karma.

    That needs some qualifying, even if you believe in Karma or ID, which
    most of us don't!

    Personal belief systems are just that...
    Personal. ;-)

    That is one of our greatest freedoms.
    The ability to follow one's own spiritual beliefs.

    I rather like Karma. It's neat and efficient.
    You will get back whatever you do, whether it's good or evil.

    In this lifetime or the next.

    TBR will get his in the long run.
    I take comfort in that thought.

    Whether or not you believe that the creator/celestial engineer
    is male, female, monotheisitic or polytheistic does not really matter.
    So long as you believe in a higher power...

    That's the point I made Om mate, most people don't, including me!

    However, I would really like to and it's not for the want of trying.
    At best I am a hopeful Agnostic...

    What exactly are you hoping for? 72 virgins?

  11. On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:29:00 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    JRH <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:29:30 -0600, OmManiPadmeOmelet
    > <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > >In article <[email hidden]>,
    > > DZ <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > >
    > >> Just as I started to believe, naively, that the Intelligent Design is
    > >> scraping the barrel, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
    > >>
    > >> > Karma is the best enforcer of Darwinism.....
    > >
    > >Intelligent Design created Karma.
    >
    > That needs some qualifying, even if you believe in Karma or ID, which
    > most of us don't!

    Personal belief systems are just that...
    Personal. ;-)

    That is one of our greatest freedoms.
    The ability to follow one's own spiritual beliefs.

    I rather like Karma. It's neat and efficient.
    You will get back whatever you do, whether it's good or evil.

    In this lifetime or the next.

    TBR will get his in the long run.
    I take comfort in that thought.

    Whether or not you believe that the creator/celestial engineer
    is male, female, monotheisitic or polytheistic does not really matter.
    So long as you believe in a higher power...

    That's the point I made Om mate, most people don't, including me!

    However, I would really like to and it's not for the want of trying.
    At best I am a hopeful Agnostic...

    What exactly are you hoping for? 72 virgins?

    I should want a much better guarantee than some Imam's promise, before
    I blew my [censored] away.

    However, it doesn't sound very likely to me, but I hope no-one is
    listening and we don't set off another round of outraged Muslims
    throwing rattles out of prams worldwide! ;o)

    Aren't they a bunch of [censored]?

  12. "JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:29:00 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:49:20 -0600, OmManiPadmeOmelet
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >In article <[email hidden]>,
    > JRH <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:29:30 -0600, OmManiPadmeOmelet
    >> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >In article <[email hidden]>,
    >> > DZ <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >> >
    >> >> Just as I started to believe, naively, that the Intelligent Design
    >> >> is
    >> >> scraping the barrel, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> > Karma is the best enforcer of Darwinism.....
    >> >
    >> >Intelligent Design created Karma.
    >>
    >> That needs some qualifying, even if you believe in Karma or ID, which
    >> most of us don't!
    >
    >Personal belief systems are just that...
    >Personal. ;-)
    >
    >That is one of our greatest freedoms.
    >The ability to follow one's own spiritual beliefs.
    >
    >I rather like Karma. It's neat and efficient.
    >You will get back whatever you do, whether it's good or evil.
    >
    >In this lifetime or the next.
    >
    >TBR will get his in the long run.
    >I take comfort in that thought.
    >
    >Whether or not you believe that the creator/celestial engineer
    >is male, female, monotheisitic or polytheistic does not really matter.
    >So long as you believe in a higher power...

    That's the point I made Om mate, most people don't, including me!

    However, I would really like to and it's not for the want of trying.
    At best I am a hopeful Agnostic...

    What exactly are you hoping for? 72 virgins?

    I should want a much better guarantee than some Imam's promise, before
    I blew my [censored] away.

    However, it doesn't sound very likely to me, but I hope no-one is
    listening and we don't set off another round of outraged Muslims
    throwing rattles out of prams worldwide! ;o)

    Aren't they a bunch of [censored]?

    Shhhh JRH, maybe Lee Michaels hasn't heard . . . . maybe let's whisper in
    his ear about the 72 virgins and it just might hasten his exit

  13. On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:54:12 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:29:00 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:49:20 -0600, OmManiPadmeOmelet
    > <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >>In article <[email hidden]>,
    >> JRH <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:29:30 -0600, OmManiPadmeOmelet
    >>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>> >In article <[email hidden]>,
    >>> > DZ <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>> >
    >>> >> Just as I started to believe, naively, that the Intelligent Design
    >>> >> is
    >>> >> scraping the barrel, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
    >>> >>
    >>> >> > Karma is the best enforcer of Darwinism.....
    >>> >
    >>> >Intelligent Design created Karma.
    >>>
    >>> That needs some qualifying, even if you believe in Karma or ID, which
    >>> most of us don't!
    >>
    >>Personal belief systems are just that...
    >>Personal. ;-)
    >>
    >>That is one of our greatest freedoms.
    >>The ability to follow one's own spiritual beliefs.
    >>
    >>I rather like Karma. It's neat and efficient.
    >>You will get back whatever you do, whether it's good or evil.
    >>
    >>In this lifetime or the next.
    >>
    >>TBR will get his in the long run.
    >>I take comfort in that thought.
    >>
    >>Whether or not you believe that the creator/celestial engineer
    >>is male, female, monotheisitic or polytheistic does not really matter.
    >>So long as you believe in a higher power...
    >
    > That's the point I made Om mate, most people don't, including me!
    >
    > However, I would really like to and it's not for the want of trying.
    > At best I am a hopeful Agnostic...

    What exactly are you hoping for? 72 virgins?

    I should want a much better guarantee than some Imam's promise, before
    I blew my [censored] away.

    However, it doesn't sound very likely to me, but I hope no-one is
    listening and we don't set off another round of outraged Muslims
    throwing rattles out of prams worldwide! ;o)

    Aren't they a bunch of [censored]?

    Shhhh JRH, maybe Lee Michaels hasn't heard . . . . maybe let's whisper in
    his ear about the 72 virgins and it just might hasten his exit

    He's past all that Oz, he'd rather sit on the stoep and whittle a
    stick poor old [censored].

  14. OmManiPadmeOmelet said:


    locker said:


    NiteDawg said:

    Came here looking for advice on exercise but found this board
    rife
    with bickering small-minded idiots.........Maybe exercise can
    affect the brain in a negative way.......Advice?.......No
    thanks

    You're right. There are numerous (moderated) internet forums now
    that have replaced this ng. Find one you like and sign up.
    Usenet for exercise help is dead.

    Proud of yourself?

    Sure. "Locker" is the chief spokesman for the web forums. He claims
    to know more about powerlifting than Keith Hobman, and says that he's
    a world-class 275-pound powerlifter. He claims that he knows more
    about blood pressure monitoring than David Cohen. And when he argues
    with me, he authoritatively cites methods used by "most football
    coaches" to dispute findings in recognized scientific literature.

    Who can argue with someone like that?

  15. "JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:
    locker said:

    NiteDawg wrote:
    > Came here looking for advice on exercise but found this board
    > rife
    > with bickering small-minded idiots.........Maybe exercise can
    > affect the brain in a negative way.......Advice?.......No
    > thanks

    You're right. There are numerous (moderated) internet forums now
    that have replaced this ng. Find one you like and sign up.
    Usenet for exercise help is dead.

    Proud of yourself?

    Sure. "Locker" is the chief spokesman for the web forums. He claims
    to know more about powerlifting than Keith Hobman, and says that he's
    a world-class 275-pound powerlifter. He claims that he knows more
    about blood pressure monitoring than David Cohen. And when he argues
    with me, he authoritatively cites methods used by "most football
    coaches" to dispute findings in recognized scientific literature.

    Who can argue with someone like that?

    I had a severely autistic teenage patient who put his head through a half
    inch plate glass window.

    He could argue with Locker.

    David

  16. OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    DZ said:

    Just as I started to believe, naively, that the Intelligent Design is

    scraping the barrel said:

    Karma is the best enforcer of Darwinism.....

    Intelligent Design created Karma.

    I hear you are a pervert?

  17. JMW said:
    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:


    locker said:


    NiteDawg wrote:
    > Came here looking for advice on exercise but found this board
    > rife
    > with bickering small-minded idiots.........Maybe exercise can
    > affect the brain in a negative way.......Advice?.......No
    > thanks

    You're right. There are numerous (moderated) internet forums now
    that have replaced this ng. Find one you like and sign up.
    Usenet for exercise help is dead.

    Proud of yourself?

    Sure. "Locker" is the chief spokesman for the web forums. He claims
    to know more about powerlifting than Keith Hobman, and says that he's
    a world-class 275-pound powerlifter. He claims that he knows more
    about blood pressure monitoring than David Cohen. And when he argues
    with me, he authoritatively cites methods used by "most football
    coaches" to dispute findings in recognized scientific literature.

    Who can argue with someone like that?

    Well obviously you "Trollmeister" because everyone who doesn't agree
    with you is always wrong! ;o)

  18. David Cohen said:


    "JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    "locker" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > NiteDawg wrote:
    > > Came here looking for advice on exercise but found this board
    > > rife
    > > with bickering small-minded idiots.........Maybe exercise can
    > > affect the brain in a negative way.......Advice?.......No
    > > thanks
    >
    > You're right. There are numerous (moderated) internet forums now
    > that have replaced this ng. Find one you like and sign up.
    > Usenet for exercise help is dead.

    Proud of yourself?

    Sure. "Locker" is the chief spokesman for the web forums. He claims
    to know more about powerlifting than Keith Hobman, and says that he's
    a world-class 275-pound powerlifter. He claims that he knows more
    about blood pressure monitoring than David Cohen. And when he argues
    with me, he authoritatively cites methods used by "most football
    coaches" to dispute findings in recognized scientific literature.

    Who can argue with someone like that?

    I had a severely autistic teenage patient who put his head through a half
    inch plate glass window.

    That was a pane I'll bet!

  19. In article <[email hidden]>,

    JRH said:

    That needs some qualifying, even if you believe in Karma or ID, which
    most of us don't!

    It doesn't matter if you believe in karma, only if karma believes in
    you.

    Seth
    --
    You have a remarkable lack of empathy. -- Penn Jillette (to me)

  20. In article <[email hidden]>,

    JMW said:

    Sure. "Locker" is the chief spokesman for the web forums. He claims
    to know more about powerlifting than Keith Hobman, and says that he's
    a world-class 275-pound powerlifter. He claims that he knows more
    about blood pressure monitoring than David Cohen. And when he argues
    with me, he authoritatively cites methods used by "most football
    coaches" to dispute findings in recognized scientific literature.

    Who can argue with someone like that?

    There's someone over in rasf who keeps telling David Friedman that
    David doesn't know anything about economics.

    There's the guy (same one, maybe) who told John McCarthy that JMcC
    didn't know about programming languages.

    This is Usenet; there are plenty of people who can argue with someone
    like that.

    Seth
    --
    chown -R us /yourbase

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.