Is active recovery a crutch for ultra-distance cyclists who lack the discipline to truly push themselves in training, or is it a legitimate tool for enhancing endurance and reducing the risk of overtraining and illness?
Some coaches and athletes swear by active recovery, claiming that it allows them to maintain a high volume of training while still allowing their bodies to recover from intense efforts. Others argue that its a waste of time, and that the energy expended on active recovery would be better spent on more intense training or rest and relaxation.
But what does the science say? Are there any studies that have specifically looked at the role of active recovery in ultra-distance training, and what do they suggest? Should athletes be incorporating active recovery into their training plans, or are there other methods that are more effective at promoting recovery and improving performance?
Some coaches and athletes swear by active recovery, claiming that it allows them to maintain a high volume of training while still allowing their bodies to recover from intense efforts. Others argue that its a waste of time, and that the energy expended on active recovery would be better spent on more intense training or rest and relaxation.
But what does the science say? Are there any studies that have specifically looked at the role of active recovery in ultra-distance training, and what do they suggest? Should athletes be incorporating active recovery into their training plans, or are there other methods that are more effective at promoting recovery and improving performance?