General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

About those authoritative impartial medical-research published papers

Started by Soft-Eng · · Last activity · 1 post · 416 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
18 December 2003
Last activity
18 December 2003
Original author
Soft-Eng
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
416
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted post said:

    The drug industry has even managed to turn peer-reviewed scientific literature into a
    sophisticated marketing device. It has long been known that corporate-funded research studies are
    more likely than impartial studies to favor the products of their corporate sponsor. But only
    recently has evidence emerged to suggest how many "scientific" studies have actually been
    ghostwritten by specialized PR firms—"medical communications" agencies—that represent the drug
    industry. These firms then pay well-known academic researchers to sign on as authors. Often these
    academic researchers are not even allowed to see the raw data upon which the published studies are
    based.

    From

    slate.msn.comslate.msn.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.