A simple question for Jan Drew

Quoted message said:

Subject: A simple question for Jan Drew
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 9/8/2003 11:34 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

On the front page of the Millenium Project this week, the following
words appear:

Book of the Week
Chemical Sensitivity: The Truth About Environmental Illness by Stephen
Barrett and Ronald E. Gots. One of the unifying principles of
'alternative medicine' is the horror of chemicals. Not things, of
course, like ricin and botulism toxin which are natural and therefore
not chemicals, or cyanide which is not a chemical when it come from
apricot seeds. The only problem with the chemical-free vacuum of space
is the radiation.

Jan Drew claims that somewhere on my web site the following words
appear. In fact, she says that they are included in what is said
above. She accuses me of lying by saying that the words are not there.

Do copy and paste proof of that claim. Where did I say you were lying in saying
they weren't there??

I didn't. Do you ever check anything before posting, or just post off the top
of your head??

Quoted message said:

"Gots and Barrett have not actually done any peer-reviewed studies on
MCS. In this book, they only offer their interpretations on
anti-or-non-MCS studies, and completely ignore peer-reviewed
publications that contradict them".

Quoted message said:

So here is a simple question for Jan Drew.

Quoted message said:

What is the URL of the page in the ratbags.com domain which contains
the words: "Gots and Barrett have not actually done any peer-reviewed
studies on MCS. In this book, they only offer their interpretations on
anti-or-non-MCS studies, and completely ignore peer-reviewed
publications that contradict them"?

I already showed you WHERE.

This red hyperlink leads to more about the book. YOU put the hyperlink there,
since it is YOUR website.

Book of the Week

I have marked the words in red which are hyperlinked.
*Chemical Sensitivity: The Truth About Environmental Illness* by Stephen
Barrett
and Ronald E. Gots.

Quoted message said:

Do not

Quoted message said:

Do not

Quoted message said:

Do not

Quoted message said:

Do not

Quoted message said:

Just post

Quoted message said:

Not from

Quoted message said:

not from

Quoted message said:

From

Please don't show us your control problem, we;ve already seen it.

If you didn't want people to read your hyperlinks, why put them there?

YOU and YOU alone are responsible for EVERY hyperlink on YOUR website.

As simple as that.

Jan

I don't give a damn if Peter lied to you, this newsgroup, his mother, or

Quoted message said:

the pope.

Rich Shewmaker Ka Ching

In said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: A simple question for Jan Drew
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 9/8/2003 11:34 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

On the front page of the Millenium Project this week, the following
words appear:

Book of the Week
Chemical Sensitivity: The Truth About Environmental Illness by Stephen
Barrett and Ronald E. Gots. One of the unifying principles of
'alternative medicine' is the horror of chemicals. Not things, of
course, like ricin and botulism toxin which are natural and therefore
not chemicals, or cyanide which is not a chemical when it come from
apricot seeds. The only problem with the chemical-free vacuum of space
is the radiation.

Jan Drew claims that somewhere on my web site the following words
appear. In fact, she says that they are included in what is said
above. She accuses me of lying by saying that the words are not there.

Do copy and paste proof of that claim. Where did I say you were lying in saying
they weren't there??

<[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

I didn't. Do you ever check anything before posting, or just post off the top
of your head??

Ah, another Jan Drew Lie.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

"Gots and Barrett have not actually done any peer-reviewed studies on
MCS. In this book, they only offer their interpretations on
anti-or-non-MCS studies, and completely ignore peer-reviewed
publications that contradict them".

Quoted message said:

So here is a simple question for Jan Drew.

Quoted message said:

What is the URL of the page in the ratbags.com domain which contains
the words: "Gots and Barrett have not actually done any peer-reviewed
studies on MCS. In this book, they only offer their interpretations on
anti-or-non-MCS studies, and completely ignore peer-reviewed
publications that contradict them"?

I already showed you WHERE.

Classic.
Refusal to post proof from Jan "I always prove my claims" Drew.

Quoted message said:

This red hyperlink leads to more about the book. YOU put the hyperlink there,
since it is YOUR website.

Book of the Week

I have marked the words in red which are hyperlinked.

Is anyone going to break the news to Jan that Usenet isn't
colored? (Am I being politically incorrect?)

--
| Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
| it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
| for new products or new versions of existing products." |
end