UK and Europe · Public discussion

A query about front derailleur alignment

Started by Zog The Undeniable · · Last activity · 5 posts · 436 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
14 March 2006
Last activity
14 March 2006
Original author
Zog The Undeniable
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
436
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. For those with braze-on front derailleurs, is the front or the rear of
    the cage closest to the large chainring? In my experience the front of
    the cage should contact first, since that's where Shimano stick that
    little transparent 2mm gap measuring thingy, but on the frame I've just
    had back from the builders, the rear of the cage is the first to scrape.
    As there is no elevation adjustment on a front mech, I suspect the
    hanger has been brazed on non-parallel to the seat tube. The mech (a
    Shimano 1057 triple) is designed for, and is being used with, a 52T big
    ring.

    If it's been cocked up then it's incredibly annoying, since the fork has
    already been sent back for having the wrong steerer length and for the
    dropouts no longer being 100mm apart. If the frame has to go back
    that's another respray and another 5 weeks (unless they pull their
    fingers out).

    I won't name the builder, but they are very well respected. In fact,
    looking at a frame they did for me 2 years ago, the front mech on that
    one is also slightly skewed upwards. I don't believe it throws a chain
    any more than it did with a clamp-on mech though.

    A couple of photos here (sorry, taking flash pictures of shiny objects
    is a nightmare). One suggests the hanger is out of parallel, the other
    shows how the mech cage is decidedly non-concentric with the teeth of
    the big ring.

    http://www.peeble.com/bikes/mech1.jpg
    http://www.peeble.com/bikes/mech2.jpg

    The reason for having braze-on hangers with the respray is that I've had
    terrible problems with clamp-on mechs slipping and gouging the seat
    tube. The cable tension on some of the modern ones is so high that I
    had to practically strip the clamp bolt to get it to hold.

  2. Zog The Undeniable said:

    For those with braze-on front derailleurs, is the front or the rear
    of the cage closest to the large chainring?

    I'm pretty sure mine are all with the front closest to the chainring,
    but it's dark in the shed so I can't be 100% (only 99%).

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.peeble.com/bikes/mech2.jpg

    That doesn't look right at all

    --
    Mike

  3. Zog The Undeniable wrote on 14/03/2006 :

    Quoted message said:

    For those with braze-on front derailleurs, is the front or the rear of the
    cage closest to the large chainring? In my experience the front of the cage
    should contact first, since that's where Shimano stick that little
    transparent 2mm gap measuring thingy, but on the frame I've just had back
    from the builders, the rear of the cage is the first to scrape.

    On a triple set up, the point on the mech at which the first contact
    occurs tends to be further back. The design of triple changers reflects
    this.

    Quoted message said:

    As there is
    no elevation adjustment on a front mech, I suspect the hanger has been brazed
    on non-parallel to the seat tube. The mech (a Shimano 1057 triple) is
    designed for, and is being used with, a 52T big ring.

    It certainly looks slightly out on your photos.

    Quoted message said:

    If it's been cocked up then it's incredibly annoying, since the fork has
    already been sent back for having the wrong steerer length and for the
    dropouts no longer being 100mm apart.

    I don't think I'd give them my business again, if I were you.

    Quoted message said:

    If the frame has to go back that's
    another respray and another 5 weeks (unless they pull their fingers out).

    I think I'd contact the builder and let them know that you think
    there's a problem. However, I'm not sure that I'd ask them to re-braze
    / re-spray.

    The actual misalignment is very slight; firtsly, I'd try it out on the
    road to see if it works! Really obviously misaligned mechs can actually
    sometimes work perfectly well.

    If there is a problem, I reckon it's worth nudging (okay, bending) the
    plate slightly. You won't need to make a noticeable difference to it,
    and you won't really even feel anything move very much when you do it.
    It'll only take a nudge.

    I spent 17 years in the specialist cycle trade, and, believe me, things
    like this are regular in professional workshops. There aren't many that
    go back for re-sprays, though...

    --
    Simon
    www.simondaw.freeserve.co.uk

  4. Zog The Undeniable said:

    For those with braze-on front derailleurs, is the front or the rear of
    the cage closest to the large chainring? In my experience the front
    of the cage should contact first, since that's where Shimano stick
    that little transparent 2mm gap measuring thingy, but on the frame
    I've just had back from the builders, the rear of the cage is the
    first to scrape. As there is no elevation adjustment on a front
    mech, I suspect the hanger has been brazed on non-parallel to the
    seat tube. The mech (a Shimano 1057 triple) is designed for, and is
    being used with, a 52T big ring......

    Quoted message said:

    A couple of photos here (sorry, taking flash pictures of shiny objects
    is a nightmare). One suggests the hanger is out of parallel, the
    other shows how the mech cage is decidedly non-concentric with the
    teeth of the big ring.

    http://www.peeble.com/bikes/mech1.jpg
    http://www.peeble.com/bikes/mech2.jpg

    I think it looks wrong. All the installation instructions I've ever seen
    show it tilted the other way with the top closest to the chainring.

    Rather than send the frame back (though you'd be perfectly entitled to do
    so), is there any option to shim the mechanism at its clamp point, using a
    thin piece as a wedge to tip the changer in the required direction.

    Quoted message said:

    The reason for having braze-on hangers with the respray is that I've
    had terrible problems with clamp-on mechs slipping and gouging the
    seat tube. The cable tension on some of the modern ones is so high
    that I had to practically strip the clamp bolt to get it to hold.

    It might be easier to ask for a small "lump" to be fitted to the frame to
    stop the band-on from moving. Or even drill the tube, fit a tiny grub screw
    to act as an anti-gouge stop. I've done the latter on a cheap frame a dozen
    years ago (which is so ancient and rusty, that this isn't a worry :-) ).

    - Nigel

    --
    Nigel Cliffe,
    Webmaster at http://www.2mm.org.uk/

  5. Zog The Undeniable said:

    For those with braze-on front derailleurs, is the front or the rear of
    the cage closest to the large chainring?

    Front, with my Campag triple braze-on and 51t big ring, but equal would be
    ideal, I think.

    ~PB

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.