General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

A correlative contemplation

Started by Peter F. · · Last activity · 3 posts · 328 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 December 2003
Last activity
30 December 2003
Original author
Peter F.
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
328
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In sci.physics.research "Oz" wrote: "Classical systems do have a space of states. Indeed much of
    physics is finding the states, and in particular separating them into classes."

    Extrapolating to evolutionary biology: Our phylogeny has its fitness landscapes and, implicitly, the
    evolutionary pressures that shaped their realized potentials.

    Finding "the states" that directly pertain to evolutionary psychobiology similarly requires
    "separating into classes".

    I have found that an optimal approach for achieving a *supplementary* (or complementary and hitherto
    largely missing) unifying understanding of our psychological (and behavioural) current selves and
    the phylogeny of our phenotype is to (similarly) 'separate out' a couple (or so) classes of broadly
    thematic patterns of evolutionary pressures *impacting on (and through) individuals*.

    Characterisitc snapshots of different kinds of environmental (and all kinds of *effectively
    endogenous*) selection pressures can, from the perspective of individuals (of populations in the
    phylogeny of fauna), be classified as sometimes predominantly of being of opportunity type, at other
    times of predominantly adversity type, and at yet other times of a *mixture* of significant
    "opportunity AND adversity type" (evolutionary pressures).

    Evolutionary/life-situational adversity can in turn be classified so as to reveal a type of
    evolutionarily as well as individually significant situations that range from being slowly to
    rapidly traumatizing (or "selective 'Hibernation' imploring"😉.

    The in the phylogeny of fauna significant life-situations that consisted of *a mixture* of the last-
    mention subtype of adversity type evolutionary/environmental/"effectively endogenous" pressures, and
    evolutionary/environmental/effectively endogenous opportunity type evolutionary pressures, are
    encapsulated and concEPTualized (with pragmatic tenuousness) as "AEVASIVE".

    That AEVASIVE also implicitly paints a both poignant and playful picture of behavioral and
    neurophysiological correlates of this *de facto principle* (an as if 'sub principle' to Darwin's
    super principle "natural selection"😉 ought just to strengthen the appeal of this my "explanatory
    philosophical term". %-}

    Yours mainly seriously this time,

    P

  2. << Characterisitc snapshots of different kinds of environmental (and all kinds of *effectively
    endogenous*) selection pressures can, from the perspective of individuals (of populations in the
    phylogeny of fauna), be classified as sometimes predominantly of being of opportunity type, at other
    times of predominantly adversity type, and at yet other times of a *mixture* of significant
    "opportunity AND adversity type" (evolutionary pressures).

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I think you are restating my 4 options. Any single individual can

    In relation to anything or any other individual outside of himself either
    1. move toward what he wants and take
    2. move against what he does not want and not take - protect from -

    In relation to anything within himself he can
    3. move toward and keep - nurturing
    4. move against and not keep -excrete out waste - protection

    These 2 sets of behaviors - one set concerning what's outside the individual and one set concerning
    what's inside the individual cover everything. They suggest 4 and only 4 specific ways an organism
    can evolve.

    Tom

  3. "TomHendricks474" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    << Characterisitc snapshots of different kinds of environmental (and all


    kinds

    Quoted message said:

    of *effectively endogenous*) selection pressures can, from the perspective of individuals (of
    populations in the phylogeny of fauna), be classified


    as

    Quoted message said:

    sometimes predominantly of being of opportunity type, at other times of predominantly adversity
    type, and at yet other times of a *mixture* of significant "opportunity AND adversity type"
    (evolutionary pressures).

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I think you are restating my 4 options. Any single individual can

    In relation to anything or any other individual outside of himself either
    1. move toward what he wants and take
    2. move against what he does not want and not take - protect from -

    In relation to anything within himself he can
    3. move toward and keep - nurturing
    4. move against and not keep -excrete out waste - protection

    These 2 sets of behaviors - one set concerning what's outside the


    individual

    Quoted message said:

    and one set concerning what's inside the individual cover everything. They suggest 4 and only 4
    specific ways an organism can evolve.

    I am sure to be restating, in one way or another, your options - precisely because they really are
    *so* generally applicable.

    I am ready and willing to adopt any aspect of your thinking (or anyone else's for that matter) IF I
    see that it *reinforcingly* fits into my 'fuzzilogical' [in parts even 'fuzzsilly logical' but
    always EPT %-] understanding of (and perversely philosophical undertaking to point-out and uncover)
    "The Blindspot" of biological sciences and much human behaviours beyond.

    This far I have adopted your "energy moderator" concept - since it is as good, or better, than most
    of its kind! :-)

    Peter

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.