could someone explain to me why the boston marathon which is
america's most pretigious marathon if not the world's is
never the site for our men's and women's olympic trials?
athen's course. now if this is true wouldn't boston be the
ideal site for our trials?
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
a boston marathon question
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 13 April 2004
- Last activity
- 14 April 2004
- Original author
- Dave Jones
- Posts
- 4
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 520
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Quoted message said:
could someone explain to me why the boston marathon which
is america's most pretigious marathon if not the world's is
never the site for our men's and women's olympic trials?Prior to the mid-60's it was Boston a lot of the time. Since
then, they use a system of "awarding" the marathon qualifier
to different cities. Blame the political hacks and their
need to have favors to dispense, I guess. -
Why should the trials always be in the same place?
Wouldn't it make more sense to have the trials in someplace
similar in climate & course to what the Olympics will be? bj"TopCounsel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040413155555.16414.00000323@mb-
m03.aol.com...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
could someone explain to me why the boston marathon which
is america's
mostQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
pretigious marathon if not the world's is never the site
for our men's
andQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
women's olympic trials?
Prior to the mid-60's it was Boston a lot of the time.
Since then, they
use aQuoted message said:
system of "awarding" the marathon qualifier to different
cities. Blame
theQuoted message said:
political hacks and their need to have favors to dispense,
I guess. -
It is going to be hard to have the same climate since you
need to have the Trials fairly far out from the Games.One issue is money USATF can make from the Trials. Another
is that you need to have a fairly fast course to make sure
that as many people as possible get an "A" standard. Boston
does not lend itself to running fast times.Some would argue that Boston has lost its prestige,
certainly on the world scale where I am guessing London,
Chicago and NY outrank it (maybe even Rotterdam and Berlin)
mainly because they pay big money and are fast courses (flat
courses except for NY). "bj" <[email hidden]>
wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Why should the trials always be in the same place?
Wouldn't it make more sense to have the trials in
someplace similar in climate & course to what the Olympics
will be? bj"TopCounsel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040413155555.16414.00000323@mb-
m03.aol.com...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
could someone explain to me why the boston marathon
which is america's
mostQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
pretigious marathon if not the world's is never the
site for our men's
andQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
women's olympic trials?
Prior to the mid-60's it was Boston a lot of the time.
Since then, they
use aQuoted message said:
system of "awarding" the marathon qualifier to different
cities. Blame
theQuoted message said:
political hacks and their need to have favors to
dispense, I guess.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.