Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

64 to 58 adaptor

Started by Gerrit Van Wijk · · Last activity · 4 posts · 654 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
21 April 2003
Last activity
23 April 2003
Original author
Gerrit Van Wijk
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
654
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I think it could work. I don't need anything smaller than a 22 but for others with a 4 arm crank who
    would prefer a 20 tooth chainring... Cut a ring out of 1 mm thick steel. Drill 4 holes to fit a
    current 4 arm mtb design (64 spacing). Drill 5 holes to fit an older 5 arm mtb design (58 spacing).
    Attach the adaptar to the 4 arm crankarms. Attach a 20 tooth 58 chainring to the adaptor. You could
    even make an adaptor for a rear cog (18, 19).

    crossposted.

  2. I realize why you would use such a thin piece, to keep from messing up the chainring spacing, but
    are you sure 1mm would be stiff enough not to buckle under load?

    May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear for the hills! Chris

    Chris'Z Corner "The Website for the Common Bicyclist": geocities.comczcorner

  3. Maybe not. But since its a very small ring maybe it will.

    "Chris Zacho "The Wheelman"" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I realize why you would use such a thin piece, to keep from messing up the chainring spacing, but
    are you sure 1mm would be stiff enough not to buckle under load?

    May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear for the hills! Chris

    Chris'Z Corner "The Website for the Common Bicyclist": geocities.comczcorner

  4. gerrit van wijk said:

    Maybe not. But since its a very small ring maybe it will.

    "Chris Zacho "The Wheelman"" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I realize why you would use such a thin piece, to keep from messing up the chainring spacing, but
    are you sure 1mm would be stiff enough not to buckle under load?

    Since it's such a small ring, the load will be very high. Imagine standing on the pedal. Look at the
    ratio between the crankarm length and the radius of that little sprocket. Your weight times that
    ratio is the force applied on that 1mm thick ring. Dicey.

    Better idea: get a 94/58 crankset.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | Become MicroSoft-free forever. Ask me how. _`\(,_ | (_)/ (_) |

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.