UK and Europe · Public discussion

406 tyre suggestions

Started by Tim Hall · · Last activity · 5 posts · 310 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
11 April 2005
Last activity
12 April 2005
Original author
Tim Hall
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
310
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Yesterday I knackered my 47 x 406 tyre on the front of the Pino.
    (Descending Ditchling Beacon, rim brakes, E = 1/2mv^2, E has to go
    somewhere, wheel gets hot, tyre popped off rim, tube goes off like a
    gun shot.)

    Anyway, this also stuffed the bead on the tyre.

    I'm looking for a replacement, something not as fat, say 35ish, but
    capable of 6 or 7 bar (the Pino is a tandem). Not a Continental Top
    Touring, as a side wall went on one of those about a year ago.

    I can't remember what make I've got on at present, which doesn't help
    matters.

    Tim

  2. Tim Hall said:

    Yesterday I knackered my 47 x 406 tyre on the front of the Pino.
    (Descending Ditchling Beacon, rim brakes, E = 1/2mv^2, E has to
    go somewhere, wheel gets hot, tyre popped off rim, tube goes off
    like a gun shot.)

    Anyway, this also stuffed the bead on the tyre.

    I'm looking for a replacement, something not as fat, say 35ish,
    but capable of 6 or 7 bar (the Pino is a tandem).

    This is a common problem on tandems where the speed can build up
    alarmingly without continuous braking. Have you thought about a
    hub-mounted drag brake? Can't help with a tyre suggestion, I'm afraid,
    but I don't think any tyre will stand up to continuous rim braking on a
    descent, even at low speed. You might try a private e-mail to Jobst
    Brandt. I hear he has been working on developing an insulating rim tape
    to address just this problem. I don't know how far along he is with it
    though.

    --
    Dave...

  3. On 11 Apr 2005 02:59:03 -0700, "dkahn400" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Tim Hall said:

    Yesterday I knackered my 47 x 406 tyre on the front of the Pino.
    (Descending Ditchling Beacon, rim brakes, E = 1/2mv^2, E has to
    go somewhere, wheel gets hot, tyre popped off rim, tube goes off
    like a gun shot.)

    Anyway, this also stuffed the bead on the tyre.

    I'm looking for a replacement, something not as fat, say 35ish,
    but capable of 6 or 7 bar (the Pino is a tandem).

    This is a common problem on tandems where the speed can build up
    alarmingly without continuous braking. Have you thought about a
    hub-mounted drag brake?

    Unfortunately the Pino can't take a drag brake as well. (Sachs 3 x 7
    hub). Hmm, thinking back a bit, Sachs do do a hub brake version...

    I did read somewhere an article by, I think, Chris Juden, with
    calculations showing that continuous braking was worse for heat build
    up than stretches of speed with max braking at the corners. This was
    far an Alpine style hairpin road.

    Quoted message said:

    Can't help with a tyre suggestion, I'm afraid,
    but I don't think any tyre will stand up to continuous rim braking on a
    descent, even at low speed. You might try a private e-mail to Jobst
    Brandt.

    Chris Juden rides with our section of the TC, so I'll see what he has
    to say. It is the first time in 6 years we've had the problem.

    A first step might be to reduce the m part of the equation. This
    would make cycling up hills easier too.

    Tim

  4. Tim Hall said:

    On 11 Apr 2005 02:59:03 -0700, "dkahn400" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Tim Hall said:

    Yesterday I knackered my 47 x 406 tyre on the front of the Pino.
    (Descending Ditchling Beacon, rim brakes, E = 1/2mv^2, E has to
    go somewhere, wheel gets hot, tyre popped off rim, tube goes off
    like a gun shot.)

    Anyway, this also stuffed the bead on the tyre.

    I'm looking for a replacement, something not as fat, say 35ish,
    but capable of 6 or 7 bar (the Pino is a tandem).

    This is a common problem on tandems where the speed can build up
    alarmingly without continuous braking. Have you thought about a
    hub-mounted drag brake?

    Unfortunately the Pino can't take a drag brake as well. (Sachs 3 x 7
    hub). Hmm, thinking back a bit, Sachs do do a hub brake version...

    I did read somewhere an article by, I think, Chris Juden, with
    calculations showing that continuous braking was worse for heat build
    up than stretches of speed with max braking at the corners. This was
    far an Alpine style hairpin road.

    Seems to me that the relevant equation is not e=mv^2/2 but e=mgh - you
    probably arrive at the top of the hill with relatively small kinetic
    energy. If you descend a fixed (vertical) distance with a fixed mass
    (both reasonable assumptions) then the energy dissipated will also be fixed.

    Mark Atherton

  5. "none" <""mark\"@(none)"> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tim Hall said:

    On 11 Apr 2005 02:59:03 -0700, "dkahn400" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Tim Hall wrote:

    >Yesterday I knackered my 47 x 406 tyre on the front of the Pino.
    >(Descending Ditchling Beacon, rim brakes, E = 1/2mv^2, E has to
    >go somewhere, wheel gets hot, tyre popped off rim, tube goes off
    >like a gun shot.)
    >
    >Anyway, this also stuffed the bead on the tyre.
    >
    >I'm looking for a replacement, something not as fat, say 35ish,
    >but capable of 6 or 7 bar (the Pino is a tandem).

    This is a common problem on tandems where the speed can build up
    alarmingly without continuous braking. Have you thought about a
    hub-mounted drag brake?

    Unfortunately the Pino can't take a drag brake as well. (Sachs 3 x 7
    hub). Hmm, thinking back a bit, Sachs do do a hub brake version...

    I did read somewhere an article by, I think, Chris Juden, with
    calculations showing that continuous braking was worse for heat build
    up than stretches of speed with max braking at the corners. This was
    far an Alpine style hairpin road.

    Seems to me that the relevant equation is not e=mv^2/2 but e=mgh - you
    probably arrive at the top of the hill with relatively small kinetic
    energy. If you descend a fixed (vertical) distance with a fixed mass
    (both reasonable assumptions) then the energy dissipated will also be


    fixed.

    Quoted message said:


    Mark Atherton

    In fact the faster you descend, the less energy is dissipated in the brakes,
    because aerodynamic drag assists the braking! Chris Juden did the calcs on
    this within living memory.

    We use an Arai drag brake on the front wheel of our Bike Friday Tandem
    Two'sday, and Conti Top Touring tyres.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.