UK and Europe · Public discussion

3rd broken rear axle - please help

Started by Justin Brookman · · Last activity · 5 posts · 991 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
9 June 2003
Last activity
11 June 2003
Original author
Justin Brookman
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
991
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi all

    I could really do woth some advice

    I have a ridgeback comet (23" Aluminium Hybrid bike cost 250 pounds) which is 3 years old, it has a
    checkered history however.

    After 2 years I was riding and discovered that the frame had broken at the droppout. ON
    investigation the rear axle had snapped also.

    The frame could not be repaired , so Ridgeback provided another frame under warranty, the components
    were moved over.

    The new bike worked well until after 6 months I discover the rear axle had broken again, this
    was repaired.

    And then this week, 3 years since buying the original bike,and 1 year into the life of the new frame
    I discover that the bottom bracket needs replacing and the the rear axle has snapped again.

    I weigh 12 stone and only cycle an; average of less than 20 miles a week over the period.

    Whats going on, have I been provided with 2 flawed frames?

    BTW I am going to get the frame checked by a bike shop tommorrow, however would like to be
    forearmed.

    Many thanks

    Justin

  2. Justin, I used to break rear axles by the newtime until about 12 years ago I resolved to never again
    buy a bike without a Shimano cassette system. I've never broken one since. This system supports the
    right side of the axle much further out than in the older system which your bike must have. The bike
    is cheap and cheap bikes give a lot more trouble than deared bikes as the componentry is not of good
    quality. This holds until a certain level beyond which you do not get what you pay for.

    It has been my experience that rear-drop failure did follow previous broken rear-axles on 2
    occasions. Frame failure can happen any bike, though it is not that common. I've had about 25 bikes
    in the last 25 years, not riding all into the ground or anything like that and currently have 6.
    I've had about 6 failures.

  3. (Justin Brookman) said:

    Hi all

    I could really do woth some advice

    Quoted message said:


    And then this week, 3 years since buying the original bike,and 1 year into the life of the new
    frame I discover that the bottom bracket needs replacing and the the rear axle has snapped again.


    If you keep snapping axles, it's possible that the faces of the rear dropouts are not parallel.

    Re bottom bracket, check that it hasn't just worked loose. Otherwise, replace with a UN52 or 72 and
    it should last a bit longer than 1000 miles.

  4. "Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Justin, I used to break rear axles by the newtime until about 12 years ago I resolved to never
    again buy a bike without a Shimano cassette system. I've never broken one since. This system
    supports the right side of the axle much further out than in the older system which your bike must
    have. The bike is cheap and cheap bikes give a lot more trouble than deared bikes as the
    componentry is not of good quality. This holds until a certain level beyond which you do not get
    what you pay for.

    It has been my experience that rear-drop failure did follow previous broken rear-axles on 2
    occasions. Frame failure can happen any bike, though it is not that common. I've had about 25
    bikes in the last 25 years, not riding all into the ground or anything like that and currently
    have 6. I've had about 6 failures.

    Thanks Garry

    That sounds like good advice however I'm not convinced (money is an issue) that if I spend 150-200
    pounds on new wheels plus cassette & chain that it won't break again.

    The bike shop thinks its my riding style, but 3 axles over two frames seems to me to indicate that
    the maufacturer is to blame.My bike shop don't have the frame alignment checking tools so I'm going
    to check it with a length of cotton. I seems my only option if aligned is to upgrade to stronger
    wheels, as you say (freehub and cassette instead of old freewheel), but I'm not convinced that it
    will not happen again!

    will decide after checking alignment...

    Thanks

    Justin

  5. "Justin Brookman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    That sounds like good advice however I'm not convinced (money is an issue) that if I spend 150-200
    pounds on new wheels plus cassette & chain that it won't break again.

    The bike shop thinks its my riding style, but 3 axles over two frames seems to me to indicate that
    the maufacturer is to blame.My bike shop don't have the frame alignment checking tools so I'm
    going to check it with a length of cotton. I seems my only option if aligned is to upgrade to
    stronger wheels, as you say (freehub and cassette instead of old freewheel), but I'm not convinced
    that it will not happen again!

    will decide after checking alignment...

    There is a significant difference between the mounting arrangements of a freewheel -- which is,
    in effect, overhung outside the bearings which are, themselves, quite close together and a
    cassette arrangement where the back cogs are, in effect between a pair of bearings that are
    spaced further apart.

    The second version is MUCH stronger and more stable.

    The first (and older) version is liable to break the axel if your riding style puts high forces on
    the cogs. This deflects the freewheel, putting large stresses on the axel leading, typically, to
    some form of fatigue break.

    To put such stresses into the system you would need to regularly cycle 'out of the saddle' or in too
    high a gear -- or have maintained your rear bearings poorly allowing above average deflections for
    lower forces.

    Since most of us go years between back axel failures (I've had one in 40 years of cycling) and since
    back axels are pretty much standard commodity items it would seem that either:-

    1. Your maintenance is not good enough

    2. You enjoy lumping away with high force

    3. You are unlucky

    4. Any combination of these.

    Changing to a cassette based wheel would definitely help. So would using a lower gear, less beef and
    a bit more grease.

    T.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.