The age old question of whos better...but instead of just saying Campy is better or Shimano is better...why not list some cold hard facts of why or why not one is better than the other. I for one have been using 04 Dura Ace and can tell you that I have had some shifting problems. Out of the box, it was awesome but as time went by I started to notice some mis shifting, squeaks from the BB. Also the shifting in my opinion is almost too smooth..sometimes you cant tell if you have shifted at all. I am putting 04 Record with FSA cranks on my ride in a few days and will report back but in the meantime...lets hear it guys...and gals...
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
2004 Record vs. 2004 Dura Ace
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 26 March 2004
- Last activity
- 28 March 2004
- Original author
- sevenrider310
- Posts
- 4
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 818
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Quoted post said:
Originally posted by sevenrider310
The age old question of whos better...but instead of just saying Campy is better or Shimano is better...why not list some cold hard facts of why or why not one is better than the other. I for one have been using 04 Dura Ace and can tell you that I have had some shifting problems. Out of the box, it was awesome but as time went by I started to notice some mis shifting, squeaks from the BB. Also the shifting in my opinion is almost too smooth..sometimes you cant tell if you have shifted at all. I am putting 04 Record with FSA cranks on my ride in a few days and will report back but in the meantime...lets hear it guys...and gals...You could read this thread 😄
-
Both good,you choose.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.