Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

20" inch fork and wheels?

Started by Al Herman · · Last activity · 2 posts · 1,146 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
14 June 2003
Last activity
14 June 2003
Original author
Al Herman
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,146
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm riding a P38 with a 16" front wheel with tiny Stelvio tires (28x349) What are the advantages of
    switching to 20" fork and wheel? Al Herman

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm riding a P38 with a 16" front wheel with tiny Stelvio tires (28x349) What are the advantages
    of switching to 20" fork and wheel?

    My P-38 started with a 16" (349mm) suspended front fork. I think what comfort I gained with the
    suspension, I lost with the smaller wheel. When I switched to the 20"(406mm) non suspension fork,
    speed, comfort and handling improved.

    Advantages: Wider selection of tires and not as sensitive to pot holes. Disadvantages: Your seat
    front will be about 2" higher and if you have short legs like me, reaching the ground when stopped
    may be a problem.

    Running wider tires even on the 349 will help in the comfort part of your ride. I will not make it
    faster Maybe slower.

    With the 406, I run Stelvios (28-406) or Conti GP (28-406). When I tour with with the P-38, I run
    Vredestein S-Licks (33-406)
    --
    Cletus D. Lee Bacchetta Giro Lightning Voyager clee.orgclee.org
    - Bellaire, TX USA -

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.