General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

1%

Started by Globaldisc · · Last activity · 2 posts · 777 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
10 October 2003
Last activity
14 October 2003
Original author
Globaldisc
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
777
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Saw this again today over at RW and thought it was ironic as we were just kicking the topic around
    thanks to Donovan.....as he mentioned the author I think...

    "What's more, improving running economy by even 1 percent can shave at least 20 seconds from your
    10-K time. Here are five proven ways to become more economical"

    runnersworld.com0,1300,1 0 0 625,00.html

  2. [email hidden] (Globaldisc) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Saw this again today over at RW and thought it was ironic as we were just kicking the topic around
    thanks to Donovan...

    If we kick the topic around *this way*, I don´t think there´ll be any serious diagreement or
    raised doubts:-)

    Quoted message said:

    "What's more, improving running economy by even 1 percent can shave at least > 20 seconds from
    your 10-K time. Here are five proven ways to become more economical"
    runnersworld.com0,1300,1 0 0 625,00.html

    In fact, I´d have had no objection if the subject line had read "5%" or "6%"! I would never
    underestimate the importance of working on running economy and efficiency, whether we are sub-3
    hopefuls or 4:30-5:00 "my goal is to finish"-marathoners.

    Anders

    PS if you two keep up with this mutual admiration society business and the "I can vouch for
    him"-silliness, I´ll have to begin to assume that you are actually the one and the same person -
    quite probably a non-runner - who employs two strikingly different styles and has purloined the
    names of two innocent New York runners who are totally unaware of "their" presence in
    rec.running:-)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.