Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

1-1/8" fork

Started by Joe · · Last activity · 5 posts · 822 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 June 2003
Last activity
9 June 2003
Original author
Joe
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
822
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Why did bike manuf. go with 1-1/8" forks, why not 1.5" ? Thanks

  2. "ari" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Because you can make more money in frame/part upgrades by going to 1-1/8 first and then 1.5"

    The current trend I hate is oversized stems/handlebars. This stuff both costs more and weighs more
    than the common 1-1/8.

    I meant to say the current standard (26.2mm?)

    Quoted message said:

    "Joe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Why did bike manuf. go with 1-1/8" forks, why not 1.5" ? Thanks

  3. Maxhr-<< Why did bike manuf. go with 1-1/8" forks, why not 1.5" ?

    Great question, when MTBs were wallowing around with 1, 1 1/8, 1 1/4, why not
    1.5 inch??

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (2)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  4. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (Qui si parla

    Campagnolo) said:

    Maxhr-<< Why did bike manuf. go with 1-1/8" forks, why not 1.5" ?

    Great question, when MTBs were wallowing around with 1, 1 1/8, 1 1/4, why not
    1.5 inch??

    Peter's being sarcastic. He knows the horrible truth:

    onepointfivestandard.comonepointfivestandard.com

    Very informative site. The worst part is that the new standard probably is justifiable given the
    ludicrous loads long-travel forks and big hits put through the headset. It's like a bottom bracket
    with a 3-foot lever on it.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] sfu.ca~rcousine President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

  5. "Joe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Why did bike manuf. go with 1-1/8" forks, why not 1.5" ?

    There are 1-1/4" forks already which is pretty big. It is just overkill for a bicycle. The larger
    size is used on tandems.

    More directly to your question, no particular reason. Steerers have been one inch, 25mm, 1-1/8,
    1-1/4 and a few dare-to-be-dfferent other diameters. If you feel there is a market, by all means
    make some and see if they sell. Chalo can be your test rider to seeif they are strong enough!

    --
    Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April 1971

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.