Is it just me or are the so-called experts who create these rigid training plans completely out of touch with reality? I mean, come on, who can honestly say they can stick to a plan thats been laid out months in advance without any flexibility or room for error? Newsflash: life gets in the way, and sometimes you just cant make it to that 6am spin class or fit in that 3-hour ride on the weekend.
And what about those of us who dont have the luxury of being able to take time off work or school to focus solely on training? Do we just get left behind because we cant dedicate 20 hours a week to cycling? Its all well and good to say just make time for it or prioritize your training, but thats not always possible or realistic.
And then theres the issue of individual variability - what works for one person may not work for another. Some people may need more rest days, or more time to recover between hard sessions. Others may need to focus on different aspects of their training, such as building endurance or increasing power output.
So, why do these training plans always seem to assume that everyone is the same, and that we can all just follow the same generic plan and expect to see results? Dont get me wrong, Im all for having a structured approach to training, but cant we do better than this one-size-fits-all approach? Cant we create plans that are tailored to individual needs and goals, rather than just trying to fit everyone into the same mold?