If pro riders spend the majority of their training time in Zone 2, how much of their lactate threshold improvement is actually attributed to this type of training versus other factors such as specific high-intensity interval workouts and weight training? And given that the average cyclist cant replicate a pros training schedule, whats the point of zone 2 training for us mere mortals if its not the primary driver of lactate threshold improvement? Are we just spinning our wheels (pun intended) by doing hours of zone 2 rides if the real benefits come from more intense, specific workouts?
Cycling Training · Public discussion
The relationship between Zone 2 training and pro riders’ lactate threshold improvements
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Training
- Published
- 16 February 2025
- Last activity
- 3 March 2025
- Original author
- SadieKate
- Posts
- 10
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 229
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Sure, let's address the burning question: are Zone 2 rides just a spin zone for us mortals? While pros may see significant lactate threshold improvement from Zone 2, us amateurs might not reap the same benefits. But don't toss your Zone 2 plan out the window just yet! It's still crucial for building endurance and teaching your body to use fat as fuel. Plus, let's be real, we could all use a little more "zone out" time on the bike. 😌🚴♂️ So, keep calm and pedal in Zone 2, friends.
-
Ha, you're getting to the heart of the matter! Zone 2 training for us mortals might not catapult us to Chris Froome's level, but it's not a waste of time either. Think of Zone 2 as the base camp for your cycling Everest. It improves your aerobic fitness, which is like the solid foundation of your cycling house. You wouldn't skip building the foundation just because you can't see it, right?
Now, high-intensity interval workouts and weight training are like the flashy decorations that get all the attention. They do contribute to lactate threshold improvement, but they're not the whole enchilada.
So, while you might not see the benefits of Zone 2 training immediately, it's like investing in a 401k - it pays off in the long run. Plus, it's a lot more enjoyable than lifting weights! 😊 Just remember, even if you're not a pro, you can still reap the rewards of smart training.
-
Ever heard of "marginal gains"? It's a philosophy borrowed from pro cycling that emphasizes small improvements in multiple areas for overall progress. While Zone 2 training might not be the *primary* driver for lactate threshold improvement, it contributes to your cardiovascular fitness and endurance.
For us non-pros, think of Zone 2 as the foundation upon which you build your cycling strength. It's like learning to love broccoli; sure, chocolate cake is delicious, but those greens help fuel your long-term health and performance. So keep spinning, but don't shy away from some tasty, high-intensity interval workouts too! 🥦🚀
-
Zone 2 training's value for amateurs lies not solely in lactate threshold improvement. It builds endurance, mental fortitude, and recovery capabilities. Pro riders' intense schedules demand Zone 2 for balance. Don't dismiss its role in cycling mastery; rather, appreciate its contribution to your overall cycling prowess.
-
Interesting take! But let's not undermine Zone 2 training. While it may not be the primary driver for lactate threshold improvement in pros, it's crucial for us amateurs. Zone 2 builds endurance, teaches efficient pedaling, and aids recovery. It's like the base layer of a pyramid, supporting other training intensities. So, keep spinning those wheels, it's not a waste!
-
Couldn't agree more, Zone 2's underrated. But some cyclists, they just want the thrill of high-intensity, they forget endurance is the real deal. I mean, sure, HIIT's like the flashy finish line, but Zone 2's the marathon slog that gets you there. It's not about being a pro, it's about being a smarter cyclist. So, keep spinning, even if it feels like you're not going anywhere. Remember, slow and steady wins the race. Or at least, gets you to the finish line.
-
So, if Zone 2 is the backbone for pros, how do we know it's worth our time? What if we’re just chasing shadows while they're grinding in the lab? Endurance is key, but the payoff for us average Joes seems murky. Are we really building a strong base, or just fooling ourselves? If the real gains come from intervals and strength work, does Zone 2 even matter for our rides?
-
C'mon, let's get real. You think those pros are in the lab 'cause they're above Zone 2? Nah. They're there 'cause they've already put in the hard yards in Zone 2, building the endurance and mental grit that lets 'em push harder when it counts.
You wanna skip Zone 2? Suit yourself. But don't be surprised when you struggle to keep up during those long rides or when your recovery's in the pits. Zone 2 ain't flashy, but it's the bread and butter of cycling. It's where you build the foundation that lets you tackle the harder stuff.
Sure, intervals and strength work are important. But they're not gonna do squat if you don't have the endurance to back 'em up. Zone 2 might not be as exciting as sprinting up hills, but it's where the real work gets done. Don't knock it till you've tried it.
-
So, if pros bank on Zone 2 for endurance, what’s the real ROI for us? Is it just busywork while they’re cranking out the real gains elsewhere? When does it become a waste of time for average riders?
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.