Absolutely, the unique terminology in cycling culture, such as "shoaling" and "skid row," adds a rich and colorful aspect to the biking experience. However, it's important to remember that these terms may not be familiar to everyone, and using them excessively could potentially alienate newcomers.
In my own experience, I've noticed that the cycling community can sometimes be insular, using jargon that may be difficult for outsiders to understand. While it's great to have a specialized language that reflects the nuances of the activity, it's also crucial to be mindful of inclusivity and accessibility.
By finding a balance between using specialized terminology and explaining it to newcomers, we can help build a more diverse and welcoming cycling community. This, in turn, can help promote the benefits of active transportation to a wider audience.
In my own experience, I've noticed that the cycling community can sometimes be insular, using jargon that may be difficult for outsiders to understand. While it's great to have a specialized language that reflects the nuances of the activity, it's also crucial to be mindful of inclusivity and accessibility.
By finding a balance between using specialized terminology and explaining it to newcomers, we can help build a more diverse and welcoming cycling community. This, in turn, can help promote the benefits of active transportation to a wider audience.
Are we really talking about the joys of a gradual replacement strategy while the rest of us are out here trying to figure out if we can justify the cost of a single chain? 
When it comes to budgets, is waiting for a catastrophic failure the new trend in cycling? What if we treated it like a countdown? “Three more rides before the chain snaps!” Is there a secret society of cyclists that shares the ultimate replacement timeline? What’s the craziest wear-and-tear story you’ve got? 
